<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>More Than Real</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal</link>
	<description>a blog about photo retouching and photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 11:53:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>don&#8217;t fear the tablet</title>
		<link>http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?p=157</link>
		<comments>http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?p=157#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 11:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[retouching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?p=157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Embarrassing confession time: I took way, way too long to get comfortable with graphics tablets. The first time I used one was at my first paid Photoshop-intensive job. I learned a lot at that job, but the work was, shall we say, not exactly high-end. A tablet wasn&#8217;t seen as a necessity for the work [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Embarrassing confession time: I took way, way too long to get comfortable with graphics tablets. The first time I used one was at my first paid Photoshop-intensive job. I learned a lot at that job, but the work was, shall we say, not exactly high-end. A tablet wasn&#8217;t seen as a necessity for the work I was doing, but I mentioned that I wanted to learn how to use one, and my boss kindly dug through his drawers and found an old tablet I could use. It was a tiny, tethered thing, several generations past its prime. Although I tried to use it as much as possible, I found it incredibly awkward, and allowed my delusional self to imagine that my mad mouse skillz made the tablet superfluous. No tablet was provided at my next big gig. I didn&#8217;t mind, and moved on.</p>
<p>Then, some time later, a professional retoucher very generously took me under her wing. She let me observe her technique with her tablet and suddenly I felt like a complete idiot for not being more serious about mastering the tablet. My eyes opened, I started working with a tablet again, and much to my surprise and delight, it resulted in the single greatest leap in my skills since I got into digital post-production. As crucial as it was to have someone experienced teach me proper technique, it was every bit as important to use a tablet that is a) reasonably sensitive (you should be able to navigate menus without awkwardness), and b) a decent size. If you&#8217;ve struggled to get comfortable with graphic tablets, the problem may not be you; it might be the tablet. Once you&#8217;ve worked with a good graphics tablet, you will never go back to your sad little mouse.</p>
<p>While I&#8217;m being a shameless shill for the graphics tablet industry, I might as well just go ahead and say it: the Wacom Intuos4 is the business, and you should sell your mother to get one, if necessary.</p>
<p>Incidentally, if you look up <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphic_tablet">&#8216;graphics tablet&#8217; on Wikipedia</a>, you&#8217;ll find this little tidbit: &#8220;In 1981, musician Todd Rundgren created the first color graphics tablet software for personal computers, which was licensed to Apple as the Utopia Graphics Tablet System.&#8221; Now you know. Also, Giorgio Moroder helped design a supercar, but that&#8217;s a story for another day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?feed=rss2&amp;p=157</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are photo retouchers doomed to become obsolete? Content-Aware Fill and the future of retouching</title>
		<link>http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?p=130</link>
		<comments>http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?p=130#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 20:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content-aware fill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retouching]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?p=130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, Adobe previewed an upcoming feature called Content-Aware Fill. It was so immediately obvious how cool this feature was that it received coverage all over the internet, even on sites that don&#8217;t make a point of talking about Photoshop. If you somehow missed it, take a look now:

For an even freakier peek into Photoshop&#8217;s possible [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently, Adobe previewed an upcoming feature called Content-Aware Fill. It was so immediately obvious how cool this feature was that it received coverage all over the internet, even on sites that don&#8217;t make a point of talking about Photoshop. If you somehow missed it, take a look now:</p>
<p><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/NH0aEp1oDOI&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/NH0aEp1oDOI&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></p>
<p>For an even freakier peek into Photoshop&#8217;s possible future, watch this:</p>
<p><object width="400" height="300"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5024379&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" /><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=5024379&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="400" height="300"></embed></object>
<p><a href="http://vimeo.com/5024379">PatchMatch: Structural Image Editing</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/danbgoldman">Dan Goldman</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>
<p>The reaction to this sort of stuff is generally: 1) &#8220;cool!&#8221; 2) slack-jawed disbelief, or 3) ohmigod, I&#8217;m out of a job. But stuff like this no longer gives me career anxiety. Let me explain why there&#8217;s no reason to be afraid.</p>
<p>In <a href="http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/ken_robinson_says_schools_kill_creativity.html">Ken Robinson&#8217;s Ted presentation</a>, amongst the many excellent points he make is that in designing our schools&#8217; lesson plans, no matter how prudent we think we&#8217;re being, we&#8217;re attempting to prepare students for a world that we just can&#8217;t anticipate. So it is with image editing. You can take every Photoshop class your school offers, you can read every Photoshop book, watch every training video, or do every online tutorial, but the reality is that Adobe (or maybe, someday in the future, some other company that&#8217;s surpassed Adobe as the dominant company in image editing—shock horror) may bring out some new feature that renders a task that used to require several (billable) hours dead easy. Say goodbye to the meticulous, carefully honed technique that took you years to perfect—if you can&#8217;t do the new faster technique, your clients will find someone who can. Someone cheaper, probably.</p>
<p>(Also, as a side note, I have to think that whenever a video like this comes out and gets coverage outside of Photoshop-nerd circles, you worry if less-savvy clients will form even more fantastical ideas of what Photoshop can and can&#8217;t do, and how long it actually takes to get things done in Photoshop. <a href="http://clientsfromhell.tumblr.com/post/294057387/hang-on-if-you-erase-the-top-of-the-building-in">&#8220;Hang on, if you erase the top of the building in Photoshop, the sky will be behind it, won’t it?&#8221;</a>)</p>
<p>The unavoidable fact, if you&#8217;re going to be a retoucher, is that you will have to be committed for the rest of your career to staying on top of the technology. You&#8217;ll have to discard the techniques that took you months, maybe even years of blood, sweat, and tears to develop the moment something quicker comes along without a second thought. And you better not waste time mastering every important new technique that comes your way. No matter how good you are, the progress of technology will never stop. That&#8217;s why I think that if you&#8217;re going to survive in this industry, it&#8217;s crucial that you are (or make an effort to become) the sort of person who never gets tired of learning new things.</p>
<p>Not such a big deal, right? Who doesn&#8217;t think of themselves as the sort of person who enjoys learning new things? But try to imagine yourself in the future, imagine how you&#8217;ll feel after years of dealing with ground beneath your feet constantly shifting. Sounds grim, doesn&#8217;t it? Who wants to stand around waiting to be made obsolete?</p>
<p>Kurt Vonnegut&#8217;s <em>Player Piano</em> depicts a dystopia in which technology has rendered all labor obsolete, except that of a tiny elite cadre of engineers. Published in 1952, with a strong emphasis on vacuum tubes and other technological wonders that have long since been supplanted in the public imagination by much more nefarious, imminently threatening technology, its specific vision of the future is rendered reassuringly impossible to modern readers. Yet the fear that underpins the whole novel, the fear that technology will make us obsolete, is every bit as powerful today, and I expect it&#8217;s especially acute amongst those in careers that require dependence on changing technology, including photo retouchers. After all, history teaches us that not only is change inevitable, it is often terrifying, unfair, and inhumane. (No wonder those who predict an imminent apocalypse are always with us. Somehow it&#8217;s very easy for societies to forget just how many wonderful things we have that our ancestors didn&#8217;t. Things like not dying of the Black Plague, not being burned alive for one&#8217;s beliefs, like children going to school instead of being maimed in filthy factories, and <a href="http://www.metafilter.com/83597/Money-Get-Away#2668827">infinite other marvels</a> that make it a pretty good time to be alive.)</p>
<p>The unpleasant fact is that the changes that will come as image editing technology evolves will not always be unmixed forces for good in our industry, just as Photoshop itself has always had a decided dark side. Someday all the most complicated things you can do, the things you considered you specialty, will be rendered so simple that <a href="http://clientsfromhell.tumblr.com/post/256073142/prospective-client-400-for-a-logo-why-are-you">your client&#8217;s nephew who has a copy of Photoshop</a> actually could do them. Or maybe, and this is more likely, you&#8217;ll be able to do new things with the new techniques that the proverbial nephew-with-a-copy-of-Photoshop couldn&#8217;t even imagine. Because you know how to experiment in Photoshop, you have a honed and sophisticated understanding for what gives an image impact, your knowledge of Photoshop, and photography, and color theory, etc., is deep in a way he couldn&#8217;t even begin to grasp. You will grow and change with the technology. It will be scary at times, but it will also be stimulating, even fun. If you&#8217;re dedicated and experienced enough to choose to make photo retouching your career, at some point you passed through the wall of understanding and you began to see inside the image. You know what it needs, you know what it can do, you see the possibilities. When new technology comes along, you will be able to explore its possibilities in a way the inexperienced amateur couldn&#8217;t even imagine. Even if Adobe came out with a one button interface in Photoshop that said &#8220;make my image beautiful&#8221; and came with a device your clients could plug directly into their brains, it wouldn&#8217;t be able to do what a knowledgeable, artful retoucher could do. The technology is only a starting point. Embrace it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?feed=rss2&amp;p=130</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>so you want to see your photos in the magazines</title>
		<link>http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?p=126</link>
		<comments>http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?p=126#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 06:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photographers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?p=126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In photography, the difference between capable hobbyist and successful professional is huge, and not just in the quality of work.  When you&#8217;re a hobbyist, it&#8217;s easy to lose perspective on just how an impact networking and paying your dues will have when it comes to building a lasting career. Courtesy of the invaluable advice-on-everything [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In photography, the difference between capable hobbyist and successful professional is <em>huge</em>, and not just in the quality of work.  When you&#8217;re a hobbyist, it&#8217;s easy to lose perspective on just how an impact networking and paying your dues will have when it comes to building a lasting career. Courtesy of the invaluable advice-on-everything resource that is <a title="Ask Metafilter" href="http://ask.metafilter.com/">Ask Metafilter</a>, here&#8217;s the beginning of a bracing response to a non-professional photographer who dreams of being published in Real Simple: &#8220;The first step is not to connect with magazine editors, that is absolute last step. If they haven&#8217;t heard of you, you have zero chance of getting in the door.&#8221; <a title="getting your photos into magazines on Ask Metafilter" href="http://ask.metafilter.com/147746/I-want-to-shoot-for-Real-Simple#2116302">It only gets more intimidating from there</a>. It&#8217;s definitely tough love, but it&#8217;s always better to know what you&#8217;re up against.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?feed=rss2&amp;p=126</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>shooting in low-light situations and the superiority of digital</title>
		<link>http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?p=115</link>
		<comments>http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?p=115#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?p=115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Photojournalist Harry Benson talks to the New York Times&#8217; Gadgetwise blog about how taking quality photos in low-light situations is easier than you might think and the superiority of digital photography.

I shoot all digital now. I have a closet full of film cameras like Hasselblad, Nikon, and Rolleiflex, and every time I pass by the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Photojournalist <a href="http://www.harrybenson.com/">Harry Benson</a> talks to the <a href="http://gadgetwise.blogs.nytimes.com/">New York Times&#8217; Gadgetwise blog</a> about how taking quality photos in low-light situations is easier than you might think and the superiority of digital photography.</p>
<dd>
<p style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:150%;color:grey;line-height: 1.6em">I shoot all digital now. I have a closet full of film cameras like Hasselblad, Nikon, and Rolleiflex, and every time I pass by the closet I hear, “Help! Help!” I feel terrible because they were all great cameras, but why should I use them when I’m getting better results with digital?</font></p>
</dd>
<p>He also gets in the usual snide digs at digital post-production. </p>
<dd>
<p style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:150%;color:grey;line-height: 1.6em">If I manipulated the photos, I would feel that everything I did was fake. I might take a scratch out but I don’t adjust lighting — that’s creating something that wasn’t there. When photographers start doing that, it can’t be called artwork.</font></p>
</dd>
<p>Kind of amusing just how quickly and thoroughly the practitioners of a medium that only won the right to call itself an art after a bruising struggle lasting more than a century become experts on what counts as artwork and what doesn&#8217;t. Must be nice to enjoy that kind of certainty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?feed=rss2&amp;p=115</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>20 years of Photoshop</title>
		<link>http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?p=69</link>
		<comments>http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?p=69#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 22:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?p=69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adobe&#8217;s celebrating 20 years of Photoshop with this cheerful anniversary video reuniting the original Photoshop team. It&#8217;s a breezy, knowing little piece that&#8217;s packed with surprising historical tidbits, Photoshop geek humor, and allusions to the scale of Photoshop&#8217;s influence on photography, art, design (including web design: can you imagine how different the internet would be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adobe&#8217;s celebrating 20 years of Photoshop with <a href="http://tv.adobe.com/go/photoshop-20th-anniversary">this cheerful anniversary video</a> reuniting the original Photoshop team. It&#8217;s a breezy, knowing little piece that&#8217;s packed with surprising historical tidbits, Photoshop geek humor, and allusions to the scale of Photoshop&#8217;s influence on photography, art, design (including web design: can you imagine how different the internet would be without Photoshop?) and culture at large.<br />
<br />
</br><br />
<object width="425" height="256"><param name="movie" value="http://images.tv.adobe.com/swf/player.swf"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><param name="FlashVars" value="fileID=5207&#038;context=356&#038;embeded=true&#038;environment=production"></param><embed src="http://images.tv.adobe.com/swf/player.swf" flashvars="fileID=5207&#038;context=356&#038;embeded=true&#038;environment=production" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="256"></embed></object><br />
<br />
</br><br />
Also of note: <a href="http://www.maclife.com/article/feature/photoshop_your_life">20 Years of Image Editing: Photoshop from 1.0 to CS4</a> is an article in Mac|Life chronologing the evolving technology of Photoshop, its (lack of significant) competition, and its cultural impact. The most exciting bit what Kevin Connor, Photoshop&#8217;s VP of Product Management for Professional Digital Imaging, had to say about the future of Photoshop: </p>
<dd>
<p style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:150%;color:grey;line-height: 1.6em">From a technology standpoint, the big trend is computational photography. Increasingly, software algorithms are being used to derive photographs that could not be directly captured using traditional optics and sensors. Today, this technology can give us seamless panorama photos or wide-angle shots with no distortion, but in the future, it may even give us the ability to manipulate a photograph in three dimensions, adjusting vantage point and focus after the capture. Ultimately, it can also lead to software that is smarter about understanding the contents of a photo and can manipulate it as more than just a collection of pixels.</font></p>
</dd>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?feed=rss2&amp;p=69</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>retouchers know</title>
		<link>http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?p=56</link>
		<comments>http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?p=56#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[retouching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?p=56</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a strange thing that happens to you when you start getting serious about photo retouching. You start to see Photoshop everywhere, in every commercial image. The texture-free skin, the hair blowing in the wind but without a single hair going too far astray, the overly soft or overly defined edges, the unnatural intensity of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a strange thing that happens to you when you start getting serious about photo retouching. You start to see Photoshop everywhere, in every commercial image. The texture-free skin, the hair blowing in the wind but without a single hair going too far astray, the overly soft or overly defined edges, the unnatural intensity of the colors regardless of the light source, the sloppy combination of images from different photos, freakishly bright and white eyes, and so on. Even if you were always a cynical/realistic sort who took it for granted that every commercial image was retouched, it&#8217;s a bit disorienting to open a magazine and see that truth made suddenly, palpably, painfully obvious.</p>
<p>One day, a friend will notice you staring at a page at a magazine and ask you what&#8217;s so fascinating, and you&#8217;ll say something like, &#8220;ohmigod, look at the edge here, it&#8217;s so obvious the retoucher&#8217;s forgotten how to feather a selection, and how can anyone pose like that without causing any wrinkles, and <em>hello</em>, didn&#8217;t she used to have freckles, and skin that was the texture of an adult human and not a baby?&#8221; And your friend will look at you with a mixture of confusion, bemusement, and just a teeny-tiny dash of pity, and you will realize that you have become a Photoshop nerd.</p>
<p>So when you see the cover of the latest issue of <em>Vogue</em> magazine, and you think it&#8217;s the fakiest bit of Photoshop fakery that&#8217;s ever been faked by a professional fakifier with an electrified faking machine, and holy cats, they&#8217;ve gotten rid of Tina Fey&#8217;s scar, her scar which she&#8217;s <em>known for</em> and <em>has talked about in interviews</em>&#8230; well, you may blog about it, but you make a mental note not to talk about it amongst the actual people you know in real life. Being a photo retoucher is tough!</p>
<p><img src='http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/7795/tinafeyvoguecover.jpg' border='0'/></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?feed=rss2&amp;p=56</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>speeding up filters in Photoshop</title>
		<link>http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?p=46</link>
		<comments>http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?p=46#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not in the mood to spend half an eternity waiting for Photoshop to process a filter on a large image? Here&#8217;s a way to make things a little quicker. It&#8217;s especially quick if you know your keyboard shortcuts.
 
Use the marquee tool to select part of the image. Select an area that&#8217;s just big enough [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not in the mood to spend half an eternity waiting for Photoshop to process a filter on a large image? Here&#8217;s a way to make things a little quicker. It&#8217;s especially quick if you know your keyboard shortcuts.<br />
<em> </em></p>
<li>Use the marquee tool to select part of the image. Select an area that&#8217;s just big enough to give you an idea of the effect the filter will have.</li>
<p><em> </em></p>
<li>Choose the settings for your filter, press ok or enter to apply.</li>
<p><em> </em></p>
<li>Undo the filter. (Either go to Edit > Undo, or simply press Cmd + z if you&#8217;re on a Mac, or Ctrl + z if you&#8217;re on a PC.)</li>
<p><em> </em></p>
<li>Deselect the area you selected with the marquee. (Either go to Select > Deselect, or simply press Cmd + d if you&#8217;re on a Mac, or Ctrl + d if you&#8217;re on a PC.)</li>
<p><em> </em></p>
<li>Run the filter again. (Choose the first option from the Filter menu, or simply press Cmd + f if you&#8217;re on a Mac, or Ctrl + f if you&#8217;re on a PC.)</li>
<p>That&#8217;s it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?feed=rss2&amp;p=46</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>the discovery of Vivian Maier</title>
		<link>http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?p=41</link>
		<comments>http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?p=41#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 01:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photographers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[street photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?p=41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s two cynical questions I have about Vivian Maier: firstly, is her story just too good to be true, and secondly, will she be judged by history as a major talent?
The story of Vivian Maier, if you haven&#8217;t heard it yet, is a simple and fantastic one. A few years ago, Chicagoan John Maloof went [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s two cynical questions I have about <a href="http://vivianmaier.blogspot.com/">Vivian Maier</a>: firstly, is her story just too good to be true, and secondly, will she be judged by history as a major talent?</p>
<p>The story of Vivian Maier, if you haven&#8217;t heard it yet, is a simple and fantastic one. A few years ago, Chicagoan John Maloof went to a furniture and antique auction and purchased a giant lot of tens of thousands of negatives. They turned out to be the collection of Vivian Maier, a hugely talented but unknown street photographer operating (primarily) in Chicago from the 50s to the 70s. Maloof uncovered a few scattered biographical details about her (she was a Jewish refugee from France, she worked as a nanny), but she remained mysterious, and unfortunately she passed away before Maloof could get in contact with her.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s left is a considerable body of work, which Maloof has been posting in bursts on a blog he&#8217;s started for her, <a href="http://vivianmaier.blogspot.com/">Vivian Maier: Her Discovered Work</a>. (He&#8217;s posting her photos at a relatively decent size too, so you won&#8217;t need to get out a magnifying glass to see the details.) The blog has been up for a few months, but it wasn&#8217;t until Maloof <a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/onthestreet/discuss/72157622552378986/">asked</a> for advice on how to handle the collection on the <a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/onthestreet/">flickr Hardcore Street Photography group</a> that the story began to take off on the internet. It&#8217;s too early to say how the photography establishment and the world at large will respond to Vivian Maier&#8217;s work, but personally, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s too soon to start throwing around names like <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tl4f-QFCUek">Garry Winogrand</a> and <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2008/04/frank200804?currentPage=all">Robert Frank</a> as reference points. </p>
<p>Photography is unusual amongst the arts in that it&#8217;s not outrageously difficult to attain a basic technical proficiency. I think it&#8217;s the sheer ease of entry that makes many people in the photographic establishment nervous and eager to establish a hierarchy. (To wit, the snobbery directed towards the so-called <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/15/business/yourmoney/15cameras.html?_r=1">MWACs</a>, i.e. &#8220;moms with a camera&#8221;.) Part of what makes the discovery of talents like Vivian Maier so exciting is that they provide the thrilling sensation that something subversive and grassroots is happening. It&#8217;s not really true in Vivian Maier&#8217;s case even though she was ignored by the photographic establishment in her lifetime. (Did she try to seek fame in her lifetime? Was she snubbed? We may never know.) Anyway, as good as Maier was, she was clearly working inside a clearly established street photography tradition. </p>
<p>Plenty of photographers who&#8217;ve since gone on to be established figures in the photographic canon went unknown in their lifetimes despite the obvious strength of their work, and in many cases, it wasn&#8217;t because their work was too controversial for their times. It makes me think there must be any number of significant artists right under our noses; perhaps not obviously revolutionary (Maier certainly wasn&#8217;t), maybe even traditional in their approach, but nevertheless brilliant, exceptional talents that will be remembered long after we&#8217;re gone.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard plenty of people moan that the advent of the digital era hasn&#8217;t resulted in any great new photographers. Maybe we should all start looking a little harder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?feed=rss2&amp;p=41</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maximizing Firefox for image browsing</title>
		<link>http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?p=33</link>
		<comments>http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?p=33#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an updated, slightly modified version of a post from an earlier version of this blog.
There&#8217;s a lot of reasons to love Firefox, everyone&#8217;s favorite open source browswer, but perhaps the best one is just how easy it is to customize Firefox to your particular preferences. All you need to do is go to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This is an updated, slightly modified version of a post from an earlier version of this blog.</em></p>
<p>There&#8217;s a lot of reasons to love <a title="Firefox" href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/">Firefox</a>, everyone&#8217;s favorite open source browswer, but perhaps the best one is just how easy it is to customize Firefox to your particular preferences. All you need to do is go to the <a title="Firefox Add-Ons" href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/">Firefox Add-Ons</a> page and click the &#8216;Add to Firefox&#8217; button for any add-on that appeals to you.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re the sort of person who spends a lot of quality time browsing images on the internet&#8211;any images, from graphic design, art, photography, news photos, pictures of kittens, anything&#8211;there&#8217;s a lot you can do to make sure that your browsing with Firefox smoother, faster, and ultimately more satisfying. Here are some of my favorite Firefox extensions for making image browsing even better.</p>
<p>All of these extensions are compatible with version 3.5, the latest version of Firefox.<br />
<br />
</br><br />
<a title="AutoPager" href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/4925">AutoPager</a><br />
Automatically loads the next page of a multi-page web document. Instead of clicking &#8216;next&#8217;, just keep on scrolling down and AutoPager will load the content for you. Especially fantastic for browsing big sets of images on websites like <a title="Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/">Flickr</a>.<br />
<br />
</br><br />
<a title="ColorZilla" href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/271">ColorZilla</a><br />
Makes it easy to sample colors from the web using an eyedropper like the one in Photoshop.<br />
<br />
</br><br />
<a title="Save Image in Folder" href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/614">Save Image in Folder</a><br />
It can get tiresome to manually navigate to a folder every time you want to save a photo from the web. If you have the Save Image in Folder extension, all you need to do is right-click on the image and scroll on over to a list of your favorite folders and choose. Very easy to set up and use.<br />
<br />
</br><br />
<a title="Screengrab" href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1146">Screengrab</a><br />
Saves websites as images. You can choose to save the whole page, the visible area, a particular section, or the entire browser window.<br />
<br />
</br><br />
<a title="Tab Mix Plus" href="http://tmp.garyr.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9864">Tab Mix Plus</a><br />
Effective use of Firefox&#8217;s tabs is the key to being a Firefox power user. Tab Mix Plus gives you an amazing amount of control over Firefox&#8217;s tabs so you can browse exactly how you like. Some of my favorite functions of Tab Mix Plus: making sure links open in the current window instead of a new one, setting it up so tabs can be very tiny, so I can fit a ton of them onto my tab bar, easily re-opening closed tabs, closing a tab by clicking on it with the mouse scroll button, and so on. Indispensible.<br />
<br />
</br><br />
<a title="Tab Preview" href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/6132">Tab Preview</a><br />
Quickly pops up a small image of what&#8217;s in each tab as you mouse over your tab bar. Invaluable when you get tab-happy and want to quickly go back to a particular tab without actually clicking on every single tab.<br />
<br />
</br><br />
<a title="Wikipedia Lookup" href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/744">Wikipedia Lookup</a><br />
Come across an artist or an art movement you&#8217;d never heard of? Just highlight any word or term in your browser, right-click on it, and choose Wikipedia Lookup to automatically open the Wikipedia page for that subject. (I find it handy to set it up to open in a new tab.)<br />
<br />
</br><br />
<br />
</br><br />
You might also try:</p>
<p><a title="Adblock Plus" href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1865">Adblock Plus</a><br />
The most classic of all add-ons. Say goodbye to visual clutter and pretty much all the ads on the internet.<br />
<br />
</br><br />
<a title="ColorfulTabs" href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1368">ColorfulTabs</a><br />
Simple add-on that makes your tabs different colors.<br />
<br />
</br><br />
<a title="Fetch Text URL" href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/518">Fetch Text URL</a><br />
Isn&#8217;t it irritating when people post a plain, unclickable url into a webpage? With Fetch Text URL, just highlight the url, right-click on it, and choose the Fetch option to open it in new tab. It&#8217;s only a small change from the usual method: highlighting the url, copying it, opening a new tab, and pasting it in the tab bar, but in practice using Fetch Text URL is quicker and less cumbersome.<br />
<br />
</br><br />
<a title="FoxyTunes" href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/219">FoxyTunes</a><br />
If you like to listen to music as you browse, FoxyTunes ensures that you don&#8217;t have to keep clicking back to your music player to see what you&#8217;re playing or skip ahead; all the relevant options are displayed in the FoxyTunes bar at the bottom of your browser.<br />
<br />
</br><br />
<a title="Nuke Anything Enhanced" href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/951">Nuke Anything Enhanced</a><br />
Remove anything you don&#8217;t like on a page via the ever-handy context menu.<br />
<br />
</br><br />
Happy browsing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cogentcolor.com/morethanreal/?feed=rss2&amp;p=33</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
